Files
WRNexusJS/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-18-wrn-html-editing-design.md
T
ClintchizandClaude Opus 5 5477f5436d docs(html-editing): add design spec for HTML support in .wrn files
Markup in a .wrn file highlights but has no tag or attribute completion,
no tag closing, and no tag-level folding: the grammar's embeddedLanguages
mapping only affects tokenization, and VS Code's HTML language service
never runs on these documents.

The design extracts view blocks into a virtual HTML document where
everything outside them is blanked to whitespace of identical length, so
source positions and virtual positions are the same and no mapping table
is needed. Region detection is a tolerant scanner rather than the parser,
because completion fires while the document is mid-edit and unparseable.

Completion merges WRNexus and HTML entries into one list ranked by
sortText, which also fixes an existing bug: the extension and the server
both answer completion on '<' today, so VS Code concatenates two lists.

Two decisions worth review:

- HTML formatting is excluded. formatWrn already formats markup, knows
  WRNexus syntax, and would fight a second formatter that is free to
  rewrite spacing inside @click={...} and client:visible.
- Only auto-close-on-type is client-side. Linked editing is standard LSP
  and lives in the shared server.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:23:08 +05:30

12 KiB

HTML editing support for .wrn files — Design

Date: 2026-08-18 Status: Approved for implementation Scope: HTML autocomplete, tag closing, hover, Emmet, and folding inside view { } blocks.

Goal

Writing markup in a .wrn file should feel like writing HTML. Today it does not: there is syntax highlighting but no tag completion, no attribute completion, no tag closing, and no tag-level folding.

The grammar already declares embeddedLanguages (meta.embedded.block.htmlhtml), which is why markup highlights. That mapping only affects tokenization — VS Code's HTML language service does not run on .wrn documents, so none of the editing behaviour follows from it.

Non-goals

  • HTML formatting. See "Formatting is deliberately excluded" below.
  • Editor support outside VS Code beyond what standard LSP gives for free.
  • Changing .wrn syntax or the compiler.

Decisions

Question Decision
Features Tag/attribute completion, auto-close and rename tags, hover + Emmet, folding
Placement Shared language server; only auto-close-on-type is VS Code-specific
Completion strategy One merged list, WRNexus entries ranked above HTML
Region detection Tolerant scanner over a virtual document, not the AST
HTML knowledge vscode-html-languageservice
Formatting Excluded — formatWrn already owns markup formatting

Architecture

Virtual HTML document

New module: packages/language-server/src/html-regions.ts, exporting virtualHtmlDocument(document).

Everything outside a view { } block is replaced by whitespace of identical length, with newlines preserved. The virtual document therefore has the same size and the same line/column geometry as the source, so a position in the source is the position in the virtual document. No mapping table and no translation layer.

This is deliberately not the same shape as the existing virtualTypeScriptDocument, which compacts code and carries line mappings back to source. Compaction is necessary there because the output must be valid TypeScript. HTML has no such requirement, so the simpler offset-preserving form applies, and the class of off-by-one bugs that mapping tables produce does not arise.

The load-bearing invariant: virtualHtmlDocument(doc).text.length === doc.text.length, with newlines at identical offsets. If this breaks, every feature reports positions off by some amount rather than failing loudly.

Region detection

Region detection is a tolerant scanner, not the @wrnexus/syntax parser. Completion fires while the document is being typed, which is exactly when it does not parse. The scanner finds view followed by { and tracks brace depth to the matching close.

Two hazards it must handle, both of which defeat a naive implementation:

  • Apostrophes in text content. <p>it's fine</p> — a scanner treating ' as a string delimiter anywhere will consider the rest of the file one open string and lose every later region. Quotes are tracked only inside attribute values, never in text nodes.
  • Nested braces from interpolation. class={cond ? "a" : "b"} and {{ a: 1 }} nest, so depth must be counted rather than scanning for the next }.

WRNexus-specific syntax (@click, client:visible, {expr}) is not blanked. The HTML service tolerates unknown attributes, and blanking would cost region fidelity for no gain.

Caching is keyed on document URI and version, so a burst of requests from one keystroke costs a single scan.

Completion

The server becomes the single authority inside view blocks

textDocument/completion gains a context check: a position is "in HTML" exactly when the virtual document is non-blank there, which costs one character lookup.

Inside a view block, one list is assembled from two sources:

Source sortText prefix Content
WRNexus 0 Components, their props/outputs/slots, directives (@click, client:*)
HTML 1 Tags, attributes, attribute values

sortText drives ordering independently of the label, so components rank above HTML tags without filtering anything out. Outside a view block, behaviour is unchanged: WRN keywords plus workspace items.

The server already indexes components, props, outputs, and slots (buildWorkspaceCompletionItems in packages/language-server/src/workspace.ts), so both halves of the merge are already available to it.

Deduplication on exact label match, WRNexus wins. A component named Table and the HTML table differ in case and both survive; a component that genuinely shadows an HTML tag name resolves to the component.

Trigger characters

The server currently declares ["<", "@", ":", "."]. Attributes and values additionally need " ", "=", "\"", and "/".

This fixes an existing bug

The extension's completion.js registers its own provider with < among its trigger characters, and the language server answers textDocument/completion as well. VS Code concatenates both today, producing duplicate entries and unpredictable ordering before HTML is involved at all.

As part of this work the extension's provider returns nothing when the position is inside a view block, and keeps its current behaviour elsewhere. One owner per context.

Consequence to accept knowingly: the server becomes authoritative for the richest completion context, so future component-intelligence work belongs in the server rather than in completion.js.

Hover

textDocument/hover answers from the HTML service over the virtual document when the position is inside a view region, giving MDN documentation for tags and attributes. Outside a view region, existing hover behaviour is unchanged.

Where a position resolves to a WRNexus component or prop, the component's own detail wins over any HTML entry of the same name, matching the completion precedence rule above.

Tag handling

Linked editing is standard LSP

Renaming <div> and having </div> follow is textDocument/linkedEditingRange (LSP 3.16), so it lives in the shared server like everything else.

Auto-close on type is the one client-side piece

LSP has no request for "close this tag as I type". VS Code's own HTML extension implements it client-side, and this follows the same shape:

  1. The extension subscribes to onDidChangeTextDocument, filtered to wrn documents.
  2. When the typed character is > or /, it sends a custom request, wrn/tagComplete.
  3. The server runs the HTML service's doTagComplete against the virtual document and returns a snippet or null.
  4. The client inserts it with insertSnippet, so the cursor lands between the tags.

The decision stays server-side because it needs parse knowledge: void elements (<br>, <img>, <input>) must not be closed, and an already-closed tag must not be closed twice. Returning null outside a view region is what stops it firing inside functions { } or style { }.

Component tags come along for free: <Card> closes to </Card> because the HTML service closes unknown tags like any other, and <Card / completes to <Card /> through the same / path.

New setting: wrnexus.html.autoClosingTags, default true, following the existing wrnexus.* naming.

Emmet

A manifest change: emmet.includeLanguages: { "wrn": "html" } in contributes.configurationDefaults.

Known limitation: emmet.includeLanguages is per-language, not per-region, so Emmet is also live inside functions { } and style { } blocks. VS Code offers no way to scope it to a region. Emmet only expands on Tab against an abbreviation pattern, so misfires are rare, but the edge is real.

Folding

textDocument/foldingRange in the server returns tag-level ranges from the HTML service over the virtual document, filtered to view regions.

Today folding comes only from language-configuration.json markers, which work at block level (page, component, view, braces). Markup does not fold, so a long <table> cannot be collapsed. VS Code merges marker-based folding with provider ranges, so block folding continues to work unchanged and tag folding appears inside markup.

One rule: return ranges only where the virtual document is non-blank. A range spanning outside a view region would let a fold swallow a brace boundary.

Formatting is deliberately excluded

formatWrn (packages/syntax/src/formatter.ts) is 927 lines, iterates to a fixed point with cycle detection, and already handles tags, attribute wrapping, multilineAttributes, and printWidth. It is a markup formatter that understands WRNexus syntax.

Adding HTML formatting would do two harmful things:

  • Two formatters would fight. Output would depend on which ran last.
  • It would mangle syntax it does not model. @click={handler} and client:visible are not HTML attributes, and an HTML formatter is free to rewrite spacing inside them.

If markup formatting is unsatisfying, the fix is improving formatWrn. That is separate work.

Dependencies

vscode-html-languageservice becomes a dependency of both packages/language-server and editors/vscode.

The editor bundler (scripts/build-editor-language-server.mjs) bundles only workspace sources and passes other requires through to Node, so the package must be resolvable at runtime from the extension. editors/vscode currently ships exactly one runtime dependency (vscode-languageclient); this adds the second.

check:editor-language-server already verifies the bundled .cjs starts under Node, so a missing or unresolvable dependency fails the gate rather than shipping a broken VSIX.

Testing

Region scanner (packages/language-server/test/)

  • The invariant, property-style across fixtures: virtual text length equals source length and newlines sit at identical offsets.
  • Apostrophes in text: <p>it's fine</p> followed by a second view block — both regions found.
  • Nested interpolation: class={cond ? "a" : "b"} and {{ a: 1 }} do not end the region.
  • Broken markup: <div class=" mid-typing still yields a region. This is the normal case for completion, not an edge case.
  • Multiple view blocks, and files with none.

Completion

  • Inside a view block: both sources present, WRNexus sortText ordering first.
  • Outside a view block: response identical to current behaviour — the guard proving non-markup contexts are undisturbed.
  • Collision: a component named Table yields one entry, the component.

Tag handling

  • <div></div>; <br> → nothing; <Card //>; outside a view region → null.
  • Linked editing returns ranges covering both the opening and closing tag names.

Hover

  • Inside a view region, a known tag returns HTML documentation.
  • A component name returns the component detail, not an HTML entry of the same name.

Folding

  • Every returned range lies inside a view region.
  • Block-level marker folding still works.

Toolchain guards

  • check:editor-language-server passes with the new dependency (bundle starts under Node).
  • Manifest assertion that emmet.includeLanguages maps wrnhtml, alongside the existing marketplace checks in editors/vscode/test.

Deferred

  • HTML formatting — see above; improve formatWrn instead.
  • Moving the remaining completion.js component intelligence into the server. This design only requires it to stand down inside view blocks; relocating the rest is follow-up work.