The island pieces existed but nothing connected .wrn compilation to island
emission. Now:
- codegen emits a data-wrn-island placeholder for component tags bound to
.tsx imports, keeping .wrn components on the normal mount path
- the dev pipeline and static build resolve island imports, thread the
names into codegen, and build the bundles
- collectScripts adds /__wrnexus/islands.js only when island markup is
present, so island-free pages still ship nothing
- island routes classify as static-interactive via hasIslands
Three bugs found by driving a real page in the browser:
1. The mount runtime was never built anywhere, so the bootstrap 404'd and
no island mounted.
2. Building the runtime separately from the islands gave each its own copy
of React: "Cannot read properties of null (reading 'useState')". The
runtime is now an entrypoint of the same build so React stays in one
shared chunk. The existing single-React test only compared bundles
within one build and could not see across build boundaries.
3. Island props arrived as attribute strings, so start={3} was "3" and
incrementing produced "31" then "311". Props now follow JSX semantics:
{…} parses as JSON, quoted values stay strings, and a runtime
expression is a WRN-ISLAND-PROPS build error rather than a silent
wrong value.
island-codegen.ts no longer imports @wrnexus/core. Compiler modules are
bundled into the Node-only VS Code extension, which contains no other
packages, so a runtime import of core broke the editor compiler; the two
helpers are implemented locally and the core dependency is dropped again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A route mounting an island ships JavaScript, so reporting it as zero-JS
static would make the framework's performance accounting wrong.
Adds a separate needsIslandRuntime flag rather than reusing
needsClientRuntime: an island needs the island runtime, not WRNexus's
reactive runtime, and conflating them would ship the wrong bundle.
analyzeRuntimeRequirements takes island presence as an optional second
argument, so existing callers are unaffected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ClintchizandClaude Opus 5